timofej/neuropercolation
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

removed performance test

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Richard Feistenauer 2019-02-17 11:17:20 +01:00
parent acaeda970f
commit 1782d32e8c
2 changed files with 2 additions and 63 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

29
cellular_automaton/display.py
View File

@ -2,11 +2,6 @@ import pygame
import time
import operator
import cProfile
import pstats
from pympler import asizeof
from . import CellularAutomatonState, CellularAutomatonProcessor
@ -61,6 +56,7 @@ class PyGameFor2D:
self._screen.fill([0, 0, 0], ((0, 0), (self._window_size[0], 30)))
self._write_text((10, 5), "CA: " + "{0:.4f}".format(time_ca_end - time_ca_start) + "s")
self._write_text((310, 5), "Display: " + "{0:.4f}".format(time_ds_end - time_ca_end) + "s")
self._write_text((660, 5), "Step: " + str(self._cellular_automaton.current_evolution_step))
def _write_text(self, pos, text, color=(0, 255, 0)):
label = self._font.render(text, 1, color)
@ -69,33 +65,12 @@ class PyGameFor2D:
def main_loop(self, cellular_automaton_processor: CellularAutomatonProcessor, evolution_steps_per_draw):
running = True
cellular_automaton_processor.evolve()
first = True
while running:
pygame.event.get()
time_ca_start = time.time()
if first:
self._evolve_with_performance(cellular_automaton_processor)
first = False
else:
cellular_automaton_processor.evolve_x_times(evolution_steps_per_draw)
cellular_automaton_processor.evolve_x_times(evolution_steps_per_draw)
time_ca_end = time.time()
self.ca_display.redraw_cellular_automaton()
time_ds_end = time.time()
self._print_process_duration(time_ca_end, time_ca_start, time_ds_end)
def _evolve_with_performance(self, cap):
size = asizeof.asizeof(self._cellular_automaton)
time_ca_start = time.time()
cProfile.runctx("cap.evolve_x_times(10)", None, locals(), "performance_test")
time_ca_end = time.time()
print("PERFORMANCE")
p = pstats.Stats('performance_test')
p.strip_dirs()
# sort by cumulative time in a function
p.sort_stats('cumulative').print_stats(10)
# sort by time spent in a function
p.sort_stats('time').print_stats(10)
print("TOTAL TIME: " + "{0:.4f}".format(time_ca_end - time_ca_start) + "s")
print("SIZE: " + "{0:.4f}".format(size / (1024 * 1024)) + "MB")

36
performance.txt
View File

@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
# ~Goal
def time_test(s, l):
first = time.time()
for i in range(100000):
s = l[i % 2]
last = time.time()
print((last-first)/100000)
time_test(1, [2, 1])
1.401543617248535e-07
heist auf einem processor ohne synchronized müsste ich ca 10 mal schneller sein? oder 3.3 mal weil 3 prozesse weniger?
# With 100x100 10 times
Try One
TOTAL TIME: 0.1217s
SIZE: 21.7525MB
TOTAL TIME: 0.1171s # Only set on change
SIZE: 21.7525MB # process size 51,4 / main(75,9)
TOTAL TIME: 0.1161s
SIZE: 20.3338MB # removed grid
TOTAL TIME: 0.1792s # probably wrong calculated (asizeof was in there)
SIZE: 20.2575MB # Factory instead of grid
TOTAL TIME: 0.1152s # dict instead of list for cells
SIZE: 20.2575MB # process size 53 / 75,8
TOTAL TIME: 0.1135s # evolve is static
SIZE: 20.2575MB # process size 50.8 / 76 (no more cell objects in processes)
TOTAL TIME: 0.1126s # fixed changed state
SIZE: 20.8678MB